• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Georgia Forestry Association #1 Forestry State in the Nation

  • Connect
    • News & Views
    • Find Forestry Experts
    • Georgia Forestry Magazine
    • Carbon101
  • Advocate
    • Forestry Equipment Referendum Campaign
    • Private Property Rights
    • Sensible Taxes and Regulation
    • Healthy Markets
    • Center for Forest Competitiveness
  • Attend
    • 2023 Annual Conference
    • 2023 Forestry Day at the Capitol
    • Regional Forestry Meetings
    • Georgia Landowner Summit
    • Forestry in Focus
    • 2020 American Forestry Conference
  • Grow
    • ForestPAC
    • Forest Resource Teams
    • License Plate
    • Emerging Leaders
    • Assured Partners: Outdoor Insurance Program
    • HuntStand: Hunting & Land Management App
  • Foundation
  • About Us
    • #1 Forestry State
    • Vision & Core Principles
    • Leadership
    • Staff
  • My Account
  • Join
  • Contact
  • Search Toggle
  • Skip to content
January 16, 2015
Posted in
  • News

Florida Times-Union: Coastal legislators Agree to Require 25-Foot Buffers Along Saltwater Marshes in Georgia

The legislators making up the Coastal Caucus in the General Assembly agreed on Thursday, Jan. 15, to add legal requirements for a 25-foot buffer of undisturbed land around saltwater marshes, putting long-standing state policy into the law.

Since 1994, the Environmental Protection Division has required the buffers or insisted on a variance with other safeguards even though the wording in the law only deals with freshwater marshes. Officials from Chatham County objected to the policy since the law didn’t require it, and the attorney general agreed. So the EPD notified local governments April 22.

Other local governments have also bristled at the expensive mitigation measures needed for development when a variance is issued.

Sen. Ben Watson, R-Savannah, said environmentalists, state and local government officials have been in discussions since April when the EPD notice stirred controversy over a legislative remedy.

“I think we’re all on board, whether you’re EPD or private property owners or a conservationist,” he said.

At issue was whether the law requires a buffer when there is no “wrested vegetation,” or the absence of plants along a water body’s bank due to waves or stream action. The law calls for buffers 25 feet from where plants were wrested away shorelines, but the water in marshes is too calm to wash away plants.

Read the full article at www.jacksonville.com→

The GFA Government Affairs Team will continue to monitor this issue and provide updates in regular Capitol Forestry Reports throughout the legislative session.

GFA Logo
Mark your calendar for these upcoming Regional Forestry Meetings! ➡️ April 13: Valdosta, GA ➡️ April 20: Blackshea… https://t.co/FcLdDd4WfB
🐦‍ Early Bird Registration for the GFA 2023 Annual Conference! Take advantage of discounted prices when you registe… https://t.co/EZ51iYaee0
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
478-992-8110
info@gfagrow.org
Forsyth, GA